My son has Down syndrome and Diabetes T1, along with a thyroid condition.
These are well managed with conventional medication and he is a fit and healthy young man of 30.
In my view, an experimental mRNA vaccine might have been fatal, but he usually shrugs off colds and is very rarely sick, because he gets to walk, ski, swim, and eats a healthy diet. (Vit D and C etc)
so: No jabs! Not for him, and not for us, in our active and healthy early 70's.
(PS, he did test positive at least once for Covid, but shrugged it off. The evidence base is totally lacking that ALL immunocompromised but otherwise healthy young people with a sensible diet and good physique and tone are at the slightest risk at all of Covid. )
These psychopaths continue because they want us ALL dead...all of us, we are called useless eaters... we are animal fodder to the NWO... they have the chosen ileitis to procreate for the future... not us. (millionaires kids)
I catch your drift, but highly doubt they want us ALL dead. Some people will be needed to carry on, after all. Perhaps we're even the "chosen ones" (or self-selecting, really); and as their dupes are vilifying us, the real string pullers are rooting for us. After all, there aren't enough billionaires to do it all; and aside from devising schemes to make more money from the ideas and toil of others, most ain't all that brilliant, handy, or physically fit. That's what adds up best in this great big freak show.
It's a shame you don't have more posts. I hope that you continue to write.
On this comment, I mostly agree. I think that anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together can see that what they are doing will selectively breed for independent thought and disobedience within the populace.
So if there really are masterminds behind this farce, and it isn't pure incompetence, then what they want is to kill stupid people.
They've left the data that proves the danger available, they've left historical facts that contradict today's narrative, they've left avenues to achieving wealth and power open.
Practically speaking, they've turned the planet into a human testing ground with themselves as the judge. Like a biblical God.
And it's not hard to conceive of why they would do this. From their perspective billions of easily manipulated people are actually a security risk. If they don't continually brainwash them, someone else could, or they might start believing in nonsense by themselves.
Either way, it would mean a massive upheaval and lots of death. And the people with the most to lose will be the most concerned about this.
If we ask why they would start this now, the answer is that since ww2, nuclear bombs have rendered national armies meaningless. Ten scrawny scientists with a nuclear missile have more destructive power than a million athletes with machine guns.
And at the same time, they can now use computers and machinery to replace the majority of the workforce. I'm guessing their utopia will consist of about 10 million people.
Approximately the number of multimillionaires.
It would enable each person to have about 15 square kilometres on average.
Appreciate the reply, Mara. Wish I had more time to write, but haven't lately.
There will always be a need for people to build things, and that won't be done strictly by robots in the near future.
And going deeper into the rabbit hole, it will ultimately prove inefficient and unsustainable, as the shortage of people with the very capability of programming and maintaining the machines - which is already a problem in the tech world - worsens.
Did you know what is the most efficient mode of transport, all factors considered, in terms of miles per hour of net effort, which was calculated about 1/2 century ago, and still holds true? Can you guess?
Technology has passed the point of diminishing returns decades ago.
Interestingly, the world of handiworkers has an exceptionally high percentage of independent minded people who will be among the last capable of standing, so to speak.
Firing wars are SO 20th century. We're IN World War III, and the weapons are psyops, bioweapons, and such. One could say 911 was the first big strike. The COVID operation leading to the jabs the next majo0r offensive.
But the attackers may have overestimated their capabilities, as did Hitler and Japan in the last world war.
Airships would have been better, but they were banned for being too dangerous.
They actually aren't dangerous, the hindenburg disaster was caused by the skin of the balloon being flammable.
In my view, the problem is not that technology and science provide diminishing returns, but that science stopped progressing decades ago. Everything we have now is still based on theories that were created in the first half of the 20th century.
Most of what has been called progress has actually been incremental improvement on the same basic design.
The engine still works the same way, but is more precise. The computer is still silicon chips, but they are smaller.
Historically, the use of firearms instead of crossbows was a paradigm shift. It made knights so irrelevant that they ceased to exist.
As was the development of electricity, silicon chips, nuclear weapons and more.
We haven't seen any such changes in a while. AI is often put forward, but contrary to what many believe, it too has existed since 1943. (The perceptron)
Quantum computers are also offered routinely, but quantum physics is also very old. From at least the 1920s, arguably.
The big bang theory also comes fron that time. As does most of particle physics, chemistry, the periodic table, etc.
I would say only the Internet, satellites, and reaching the moon were considerable leaps forward.
The bicycle. At least for individuals who are not hauling very much stuff. When one thinks of all the time spent associated with vehicles that can travel faster, it makes perfect sense.
It has been uncommon for people to reject technological developments, but more people are doing so lately.
Though it is nothing new. Some wise indigenous people in areas where there was consistently sufficient food to hunt and opted against farming, though they knew how. And have been more healthy for it. Some, such as many of the tribes in N America, did both.
Oh dear Frank I really don't want to be a slave to those psychopaths...perish the thought...I would rather take a pill (not that I take ANY pharma meds) I am vegan and only have herbal so it would have to be overkill on some weed :-) Blessings keep well.
I'm thinking more along the lines of a genuine great reset of our own. Not unlike a new and improved version of the American Revolution, but in which are rights are much more than just so many words on paper to which tyrants and stooges who call themselves "Democrats" or "Republicans" give lip service.
I'm also well aware the American Revolution wasn't quite what we yanks were taught. My sympathy goes for the natives who were here first, from whom the founders cribbed a lot of our bill of rights, which have become pretty much suitable for toilet paper as of late.
Many thanks for your post. It is awful, but then it always has been awful, big pharma have been in this game for decades.
The thing about measles is that in fact all internal diseases are toxic poisoning with symptoms remarkably similar when looked at in the round and compared with other so-called diseases.
What would be interesting is to tie up past vaccination programs and uptake in the population with deaths as I would expect a correlation.
I was certainly surprised to have heard that the flu and pneumonia death rate in the US (they're combined in the US stats) has actually increased since flu shots came on the scene. Likewise, the shingles rate after the introduction of varicella vaccines, and the cervical cancer rate in the first generation to have received HPV vaccines in the UK.
The data is consistent with the vaccine having helped speed the eradication of measles, but at the time the vaccine was introduced, the death rate was very, very low, about 1 per 400,000 per year in the US. How many life years have been lost due to the effects of the measles jabs? And what about optimal health? That is the factor that is all-important to many of us, and is almost completely swept under the rug.
Not to mention, how much lower the death rates due to these diseases would be if they were properly treated, with effective measures such as vitamin D optimization, megadose vitamin C and other nutrients, heat, nebulized H2O2, etc, etc.
Absolutely. This may interest you. I had BCG vaccine in 1975 at boarding school. They used something like a phaser from Star Trek to administer!
Whilst I do not (yet) have exact dates, I was extremely ill that year with what was called German measles. Temperature of 104 F and in sanatorium of 2 weeks. I did not recover my strength until after the summer.
It was only in 2020/2021 that I made the connection that the vaccine was the likely cause. I can see no other logical explanation and no doubt Spock would agree!
I feel the same as you do. I have one or two other words to add as well!
Anyway, thank you, very helpful. I shall note your witness to that to bear up my experience. My mother is no longer alive to see what she would think and I am not sure my father would necessarily remember. Still, I must try and ask and see if he recalls anything.
He still thinks vaccines generally are ok though despite my telling him they weren't. :(
Ah bless her. If I get time I will send you a list of what happened to ALL my own vaccines over the years and my daughters and sons... it's a nightmare.
My son has Down syndrome and Diabetes T1, along with a thyroid condition.
These are well managed with conventional medication and he is a fit and healthy young man of 30.
In my view, an experimental mRNA vaccine might have been fatal, but he usually shrugs off colds and is very rarely sick, because he gets to walk, ski, swim, and eats a healthy diet. (Vit D and C etc)
so: No jabs! Not for him, and not for us, in our active and healthy early 70's.
(PS, he did test positive at least once for Covid, but shrugged it off. The evidence base is totally lacking that ALL immunocompromised but otherwise healthy young people with a sensible diet and good physique and tone are at the slightest risk at all of Covid. )
Glad to read his conditions are being well managed, and he's fit and healthy.
Yes, he is fine.
These psychopaths continue because they want us ALL dead...all of us, we are called useless eaters... we are animal fodder to the NWO... they have the chosen ileitis to procreate for the future... not us. (millionaires kids)
I catch your drift, but highly doubt they want us ALL dead. Some people will be needed to carry on, after all. Perhaps we're even the "chosen ones" (or self-selecting, really); and as their dupes are vilifying us, the real string pullers are rooting for us. After all, there aren't enough billionaires to do it all; and aside from devising schemes to make more money from the ideas and toil of others, most ain't all that brilliant, handy, or physically fit. That's what adds up best in this great big freak show.
It's a shame you don't have more posts. I hope that you continue to write.
On this comment, I mostly agree. I think that anyone with more than two brain cells to rub together can see that what they are doing will selectively breed for independent thought and disobedience within the populace.
So if there really are masterminds behind this farce, and it isn't pure incompetence, then what they want is to kill stupid people.
They've left the data that proves the danger available, they've left historical facts that contradict today's narrative, they've left avenues to achieving wealth and power open.
Practically speaking, they've turned the planet into a human testing ground with themselves as the judge. Like a biblical God.
And it's not hard to conceive of why they would do this. From their perspective billions of easily manipulated people are actually a security risk. If they don't continually brainwash them, someone else could, or they might start believing in nonsense by themselves.
Either way, it would mean a massive upheaval and lots of death. And the people with the most to lose will be the most concerned about this.
If we ask why they would start this now, the answer is that since ww2, nuclear bombs have rendered national armies meaningless. Ten scrawny scientists with a nuclear missile have more destructive power than a million athletes with machine guns.
And at the same time, they can now use computers and machinery to replace the majority of the workforce. I'm guessing their utopia will consist of about 10 million people.
Approximately the number of multimillionaires.
It would enable each person to have about 15 square kilometres on average.
Appreciate the reply, Mara. Wish I had more time to write, but haven't lately.
There will always be a need for people to build things, and that won't be done strictly by robots in the near future.
And going deeper into the rabbit hole, it will ultimately prove inefficient and unsustainable, as the shortage of people with the very capability of programming and maintaining the machines - which is already a problem in the tech world - worsens.
Did you know what is the most efficient mode of transport, all factors considered, in terms of miles per hour of net effort, which was calculated about 1/2 century ago, and still holds true? Can you guess?
Technology has passed the point of diminishing returns decades ago.
Interestingly, the world of handiworkers has an exceptionally high percentage of independent minded people who will be among the last capable of standing, so to speak.
Firing wars are SO 20th century. We're IN World War III, and the weapons are psyops, bioweapons, and such. One could say 911 was the first big strike. The COVID operation leading to the jabs the next majo0r offensive.
But the attackers may have overestimated their capabilities, as did Hitler and Japan in the last world war.
Have a job to go to, more later.
I'm guessing it's trains.
Airships would have been better, but they were banned for being too dangerous.
They actually aren't dangerous, the hindenburg disaster was caused by the skin of the balloon being flammable.
In my view, the problem is not that technology and science provide diminishing returns, but that science stopped progressing decades ago. Everything we have now is still based on theories that were created in the first half of the 20th century.
Most of what has been called progress has actually been incremental improvement on the same basic design.
The engine still works the same way, but is more precise. The computer is still silicon chips, but they are smaller.
Historically, the use of firearms instead of crossbows was a paradigm shift. It made knights so irrelevant that they ceased to exist.
As was the development of electricity, silicon chips, nuclear weapons and more.
We haven't seen any such changes in a while. AI is often put forward, but contrary to what many believe, it too has existed since 1943. (The perceptron)
Quantum computers are also offered routinely, but quantum physics is also very old. From at least the 1920s, arguably.
The big bang theory also comes fron that time. As does most of particle physics, chemistry, the periodic table, etc.
I would say only the Internet, satellites, and reaching the moon were considerable leaps forward.
The bicycle. At least for individuals who are not hauling very much stuff. When one thinks of all the time spent associated with vehicles that can travel faster, it makes perfect sense.
It has been uncommon for people to reject technological developments, but more people are doing so lately.
Though it is nothing new. Some wise indigenous people in areas where there was consistently sufficient food to hunt and opted against farming, though they knew how. And have been more healthy for it. Some, such as many of the tribes in N America, did both.
Ah yes, in many ways you're right. But I would qualify my agreement by saying that the bicycle's efficiency is really a product of human efficiency.
In fact, from many perspectives, the human body is vastly superior to the technology we have.
They are, in effect, a collective of self building and self repairing nanomachines.
The bicycle was also developed around the 19th century.
Anyway, the train is the most efficient form of freight transportation. Also developed in the 19th century.
Oh dear Frank I really don't want to be a slave to those psychopaths...perish the thought...I would rather take a pill (not that I take ANY pharma meds) I am vegan and only have herbal so it would have to be overkill on some weed :-) Blessings keep well.
I'm thinking more along the lines of a genuine great reset of our own. Not unlike a new and improved version of the American Revolution, but in which are rights are much more than just so many words on paper to which tyrants and stooges who call themselves "Democrats" or "Republicans" give lip service.
https://rumble.com/v27r5ae-cdc-boss-its-time-to-kill-white-people-who-refuse-vaccines.html
I see, yes I agree. Remember, I am British and my home is London U.K. but yes.
I'm also well aware the American Revolution wasn't quite what we yanks were taught. My sympathy goes for the natives who were here first, from whom the founders cribbed a lot of our bill of rights, which have become pretty much suitable for toilet paper as of late.
Hello from the UK
Many thanks for your post. It is awful, but then it always has been awful, big pharma have been in this game for decades.
The thing about measles is that in fact all internal diseases are toxic poisoning with symptoms remarkably similar when looked at in the round and compared with other so-called diseases.
What would be interesting is to tie up past vaccination programs and uptake in the population with deaths as I would expect a correlation.
I was certainly surprised to have heard that the flu and pneumonia death rate in the US (they're combined in the US stats) has actually increased since flu shots came on the scene. Likewise, the shingles rate after the introduction of varicella vaccines, and the cervical cancer rate in the first generation to have received HPV vaccines in the UK.
The data is consistent with the vaccine having helped speed the eradication of measles, but at the time the vaccine was introduced, the death rate was very, very low, about 1 per 400,000 per year in the US. How many life years have been lost due to the effects of the measles jabs? And what about optimal health? That is the factor that is all-important to many of us, and is almost completely swept under the rug.
Not to mention, how much lower the death rates due to these diseases would be if they were properly treated, with effective measures such as vitamin D optimization, megadose vitamin C and other nutrients, heat, nebulized H2O2, etc, etc.
Absolutely. This may interest you. I had BCG vaccine in 1975 at boarding school. They used something like a phaser from Star Trek to administer!
Whilst I do not (yet) have exact dates, I was extremely ill that year with what was called German measles. Temperature of 104 F and in sanatorium of 2 weeks. I did not recover my strength until after the summer.
It was only in 2020/2021 that I made the connection that the vaccine was the likely cause. I can see no other logical explanation and no doubt Spock would agree!
Bastards... yes both my now adult children) were sick for ages after that shite... and more.
I feel the same as you do. I have one or two other words to add as well!
Anyway, thank you, very helpful. I shall note your witness to that to bear up my experience. My mother is no longer alive to see what she would think and I am not sure my father would necessarily remember. Still, I must try and ask and see if he recalls anything.
He still thinks vaccines generally are ok though despite my telling him they weren't. :(
But he boosted vitamin D on my advice. :)
Ah bless her. If I get time I will send you a list of what happened to ALL my own vaccines over the years and my daughters and sons... it's a nightmare.
Do sent a list if you can spare the time, but I know what it is like, so much to do.
Wow, I gather you're doing much better now, after reading some "misinformation" from "quacks"? ;)
Wow, thanks. In Canada, yet, the bastion of anti-scientific tyranny.